9.9 and 141.85 mph

Welcome, Guest

Manuals | Magazines | T-Shirts

Yamaha Star V-Max Forum

VMax Forums

VMax Racing

9.9 and 141.85 mph

(1 viewing) (1) Guest

New Topic

Page:
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
73

TOPIC: 9.9 and 141.85 mph

Re:9.9 and 141.85 mph 1 year, 6 months ago #51

What GREAT fkn pictures! VMaxers...we shall now be... unified. Well, what do you have to say "a~"? p.s. You should draw quite a reaction from your run man! p.s. again... This run should be documented on the forum home page o.k...I'm going to sleep	Remaxed NOW ONLINE Senior Max Posts: 452
Don't sweat the small stuff... it aint worth it! Last Edit: 1 year, 6 months ago By Remaxed. Reason: spell The topic has been locked.

Re:9.9 and 141.85 mph 1 year, 6 months ago #52

Bad_Max wrote: Yes, Jay ran it through the 1/4 mile. I really think the difference is seat time on the new Vmax Not at a track - not for the magazine. Only Dale got track time, but only 10 runs .	fxstein OFFLINE Moderator Time to Ride! This is VMax! Posts: 5988
"It's time to Ride - This is Vmax." The topic has been locked.

Re:9.9 and 141.85 mph 1 year, 6 months ago #53

fastmax1 wrote: LOL!! Great job. I can hardly wait for all the comments saying "it must have been modded, must have been a pro rider, must have had the wind at his back....must have this, must have that....". There will be excuses. WELL they always make up excuses and never showup at the track they are just internet racers	IMFASTTOO NOW ONLINE Expert Max Posts: 940
Last Edit: 1 year, 6 months ago By IMFASTTOO. The topic has been locked.

Re:9.9 and 141.85 mph 1 year, 6 months ago #54

You are small tho. Weight 130? Looks like you did enough in the burnout box to get it to stick	Bad_Max NOW ONLINE Community Accessory Master Posts: 7689
Be smart, Be visible, Be Protected, Ride safe.... The topic has been locked.

Re:9.9 and 141.85 mph 1 year, 6 months ago #55

fxstein wrote: Bad_Max wrote: Yes, Jay ran it through the 1/4 mile. I really think the difference is seat time on the new Vmax Not at a track - not for the magazine. Only Dale got track time, but only 10 runs . WE ONLY HAD 5 RUNS	IMFASTTOO NOW ONLINE Expert Max Posts: 940
The topic has been locked.

Re:9.9 and 141.85 mph 1 year, 6 months ago #56

My compliments! THis surely is worthy a front page article! You've got PM!	fxstein OFFLINE Moderator Time to Ride! This is VMax! Posts: 5988
"It's time to Ride - This is Vmax." The topic has been locked.

Re:9.9 and 141.85 mph 1 year, 6 months ago #57

Bad_Max wrote: Yes, Jay ran it through the 1/4 mile, but I really think the difference is seat time on the new Vmax The article I have is right here and is a little confusing. The journalist did a 10.26 best and Dale did a 10.13. Jay never actually raced it.	dozerdogue OFFLINE Senior Max Posts: 117
The topic has been locked.

Re:9.9 and 141.85 mph 1 year, 6 months ago #58

Bad_Max wrote: You are small tho. Weight 130? Looks like you did enough in the burnout box to get it to stick YO BAD 165lbs	IMFASTTOO NOW ONLINE Expert Max Posts: 940
The topic has been locked.

Re:9.9 and 141.85 mph 1 year, 6 months ago #59

IMFASTTOO did you try the the track with both the race and stock ECU. If so did you notice any difference.	2nd max OFFLINE Senior Max Posts: 319
The topic has been locked.

Re:9.9 and 141.85 mph 1 year, 6 months ago #60

Great job.

I think all the magazine riders hit the speed limiter, if you look at their top speeds they all were 137ish (measured by the track). Maybe I am thinking wrong, but since the indicated speed on the max is higher than actual the bike probably was at the limiter at 137.

Just wait until we see someone like Jay or Dale run without the limiter, a better tire, with the x-pipe, commander and big air.